<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Daniel O. McClellan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Larry Hurtado Reviews Staudt&#8217;s Der eine und einzige Gott by Christians, Monotheism, and the Trinity</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2013/05/18/larry-hurtado-reviews-staudts-der-eine-und-einzige-gott/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christians, Monotheism, and the Trinity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=2112#comment-3431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Dan McClellan and Johnson Thomaskutty interacted with a recent post by Larry Hurtado, reviewing a book about the &#8220;one and only God.&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dan McClellan and Johnson Thomaskutty interacted with a recent post by Larry Hurtado, reviewing a book about the &#8220;one and only God.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Jordan Codices Photos by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/new-jordan-codices-photos/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1945#comment-3429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] but he is refusing to share them. No doubt they are reserved for his forthcoming publication. These blog posts have  done more to disseminate info on the codices than Elkington ever has. Isn&#8217;t [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] but he is refusing to share them. No doubt they are reserved for his forthcoming publication. These blog posts have  done more to disseminate info on the codices than Elkington ever has. Isn&#8217;t [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jordan Codices Photos by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/jordan-codices-photos/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1718#comment-3428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] but he is refusing to share them. No doubt they are reserved for his forthcoming publication. These blog posts have  done more to disseminate info on the codices than Elkington ever has. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] but he is refusing to share them. No doubt they are reserved for his forthcoming publication. These blog posts have  done more to disseminate info on the codices than Elkington ever has. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Short Video on Jordan Codices by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/short-video-on-jordan-codices/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1794#comment-3427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] tests that insist the lead is old. Let us not forget that these are the metallurgical tests that Elkington himself altered in order to obscure doubts expressed [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tests that insist the lead is old. Let us not forget that these are the metallurgical tests that Elkington himself altered in order to obscure doubts expressed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Preliminary Translation of the Jordan Codices is Offered by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/08/25/a-preliminary-translation-of-the-jordan-codices-is-offered/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1663#comment-3426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] has been shown to be nothing more than wishful thinking combined with heavy squinting (here). No response has been offered to that criticism. All we&#8217;ve heard is Elkington tell me I [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has been shown to be nothing more than wishful thinking combined with heavy squinting (here). No response has been offered to that criticism. All we&#8217;ve heard is Elkington tell me I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Jordan Lead Codices by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/thoughts-on-the-jordan-lead-codices/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1406#comment-3425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Further Jordan Codices Update by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2012/06/27/further-jordan-codices-update/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=2019#comment-3424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Response to David Elkington by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/in-response-to-david-elkington/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1899#comment-3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] unquestionably links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unquestionably links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Lead vs. Copper Codices by Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/on-the-lead-vs-bronze-codices/#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Barker on the Jordan Codices &#124; Daniel O. McClellan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1392#comment-3422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] and unquestionably links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and unquestionably links every scroll so far made public to the same workshop or craftsman (see here, here, here, or here, for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Jesus&#8217; Divinity by Caleb Cumberland</title>
		<link>http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/on-jesus-divinity/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb Cumberland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/?p=1904#comment-3395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John&#039;s Gospel identifies Jesus as the Word and the Word as God, so it seems clear to me that Jesus is identified to be God. 

Also, Jesus prays that His followers &quot;be one, as we are one&quot; but this does not mean &quot;one&quot; with the Father and Son. Of course, disciples are to eventually partake in the divine nature (2 Pet. 1:4) but I&#039;m not sure that that is what is alluded to in John 17. 

Jesus also partakes in creation and is worshipped, which are only things which God can be the subject of.

To me it is very evident that Jesus is identified as God in the scriptures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John&#8217;s Gospel identifies Jesus as the Word and the Word as God, so it seems clear to me that Jesus is identified to be God. </p>
<p>Also, Jesus prays that His followers &#8220;be one, as we are one&#8221; but this does not mean &#8220;one&#8221; with the Father and Son. Of course, disciples are to eventually partake in the divine nature (2 Pet. 1:4) but I&#8217;m not sure that that is what is alluded to in John 17. </p>
<p>Jesus also partakes in creation and is worshipped, which are only things which God can be the subject of.</p>
<p>To me it is very evident that Jesus is identified as God in the scriptures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
